![]() Twenty-two years ago, I would have thought differently. At the end of the day, the match was not a curse but a blessing, because I was a part of something very important. At the top of the interview, he told Wired: the first ones to sell humanity out, who, as we all know, won’t be spared for their betrayal, anyway). Wired interviewed Kasparov on the occasion of a debate hosted by the Association for the Advancement of Artificial Intelligence (a.k.a. Now, in a new interview with Wired, Kasparov has done what most of us should do with most of the shitty things in our lives, which is: Come to terms with it (and then figure out how to perm it into your own personal narrative in the most marketable way possible). Twenty-three years ago - long before “machine learning” was a term regularly belched up by luddites hiding behind dumb mid-level marketing buzzwords and printed-out Recode posts - IBM’s Deep Blue AI beat reigning global Chess grandmaster Garry Kasparov, sending shockwaves through the worlds of chess, computing, and conspiratorial technophobes, as fear of sentient computing had permeated another layer of pop culture.
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |